Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Balancing Tradeoffs in Climate-Smart Agriculture: Will Selling Carbon Credits Offset Potential Losses in the Net Yield Income of Small-Scale Soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) Producers in the Mid-Southern United States?

Adrienne L. Contasti, Alexandra G. Firth, Beth H. Baker, John P. Brooks, Martin A. Locke, Dana J. Morin

Decision Analysis · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

There is a need to achieve sustainable agricultural production to secure food, fiber, and fuel for a growing global population. Climate-smart (CS) actions (no-till and cover crops) can reduce carbon emissions and promote soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. Contemporary voluntary carbon markets provide producers with a monetary incentive to adopt CS actions. However, SOC–yield dynamics under CS actions are not well known, making it difficult for producers to judge whether additional income from carbon credits will offset potential losses to yield income. We designed a SOC–yield framework that captures SOC–yield–income dynamics under traditional (reduced tillage, no cover crops) and CS actions. Using a modified structured decision-making approach, we applied the framework to a case study in w

Subject
Soil carbon & organic matter
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.1287/deca.2023.0478
Catalogue ID
SNmov5hulv-n5r5w9
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.