Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Opportunities and challenges of using human excreta-derived fertilizers in agriculture: A review of suitability, environmental impact and societal acceptance

Sarah van den Broek, Inna Nybom, Martin Hartmann, Sebastian Döetterl, Gina Garland

The Science of The Total Environment · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review synthesizes evidence on human excreta-derived fertilizers (HEDFs) as a circular agriculture solution, examining their nutritional value, typical contaminants (pharmaceuticals, persistent organic compounds, heavy metals, pathogens), and environmental outcomes. The authors found HEDFs deliver overall positive effects on crop yield, soil nutrients, and microbial interactions, with processing treatments substantially reducing contaminants, though complete removal is not achieved. The review emphasises that public acceptance is achievable with appropriate regulation and outreach, particularly in regions where conventional fertilizers are scarce.

UK applicability

The findings are potentially applicable to UK policy discussions around nutrient recovery and circular economy agriculture, though UK regulations (Water Industry Act, Environmental Permitting) currently restrict HEDF use. The review's emphasis on processing standards and risk management may inform future regulatory frameworks if attitudes toward resource recovery from sewage systems shift.

Key measures

Crop yield; soil nutrient content; plant-soil-microbe interactions; plant pathogen suppression; water contamination risk; human pathogen risk; consumer and farmer acceptance; contaminant reduction through processing treatments

Outcomes reported

This systematic review evaluated the suitability of human excreta-derived fertilizers (HEDFs) as nutrient sources, their contaminant profiles, environmental impacts on crops and soils, and societal acceptance. The review assessed how processing treatments affect fertiliser quality and the relative risks of pathogen contamination compared to inorganic fertilizers.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil fertility & nutrient management
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177306
Catalogue ID
SNmov5ib87-0pobnr

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.