Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

The effect of contrasting biosolids application strategies on soil quality

María Jesús Gutiérrez Ginés, Niklas J. Lehto, Engracia Madejón, Brett Robinson

Plant and Soil · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This controlled experimental study examined how the application method and rate of biosolids affects soil quality parameters and the mobility of contaminants. Incorporation of biosolids increased exchangeable trace elements (Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni, Cd) compared with surface application, whilst surface application increased inorganic nitrogen but decreased soil pH and microbial activity. Root presence significantly enhanced biological activity and nutrient availability whilst reducing exchangeable Mn and Fe concentrations.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK agricultural and environmental practice, as biosolids application is a common soil amendment strategy in the United Kingdom. The results suggest that incorporation method substantially influences both nutrient availability and the risk of trace element mobility, which has implications for UK guidance on sustainable biosolids management and soil protection regulations.

Key measures

Soil fertility (inorganic N, exchangeable P, Mg, Ca, K); exchangeable trace and non-essential elements (Al, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd, Cr, Ni); soil pH; dehydrogenase activity (biological activity); pore water chemistry; rhizosphere properties

Outcomes reported

The study compared soil quality indicators (fertility, trace element mobility, biological activity) and contaminant behaviour under three biosolids application strategies (surface application, incorporation to 25 cm depth, and patch incorporation) at three application rates. Results showed differential effects on nutrient availability, soil pH, microbial activity, and exchangeable trace element concentrations depending on application method.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil fertility & nutrient management
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory pot and rhizobox experiments
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1007/s11104-023-06029-z
Catalogue ID
SNmov5ib87-cdfqm4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.