Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Recycling sludge on cropland as fertilizer – Advantages and risks

Mahmoud F. Seleiman, Arja Santanen, Pirjo Mäkelä

Resources Conservation and Recycling · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This review examines the dual character of sewage sludge recycling on agricultural land: as an economically attractive source of plant nutrients and organic matter, whilst acknowledging significant environmental and health risks from heavy metal bioaccumulation, pathogenic microorganisms, and persistent contaminants. The authors balance the circular economy argument against documented hazards, as suggested by peer-reviewed evidence circa 2015–2019.

UK applicability

The UK has regulated sludge-to-land application under the Quality Protocol and PAS 100, but this review's risk assessment remains pertinent to ongoing policy debate around acceptable contamination thresholds and long-term soil legacy effects in intensive arable regions.

Key measures

Nutrient content of sludge; crop yield responses; accumulation of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants in soil and plant tissues; microbial and chemical contaminant loads

Outcomes reported

The study examined the agronomic value and environmental risks of applying recycled sewage sludge as a fertiliser on cropland, synthesising evidence on nutrient cycling, crop productivity, and contamination pathways.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil fertility & nutrient management
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104647
Catalogue ID
SNmov5ix44-3m2slj

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.