Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Comparing measures for determination of phosphorus saturation as a method to estimate dissolved P in soil solution

Karin Blombäck, Carl H. Bolster, Anders Lindsjö, Kathrin Hesse, Helena Linefur, Mohammed Masud Parvage

Geoderma · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comparative study evaluated four different approaches to calculating phosphorus saturation indices as simple field-applicable indicators of soil P leaching risk to sensitive water bodies. Both ammonium oxalate-derived (AlOX + FeOX) and PSI-based methods showed strong correlation with fitted Langmuir sorption capacity, whilst ammonium lactate-derived estimates did not. The findings demonstrate that multiple DPS calculation methods can effectively predict a soil's propensity to release dissolved phosphorus, providing practitioners with flexibility in method selection for identifying phosphorus leaching hotspots.

UK applicability

These findings are applicable to UK agricultural practice and environmental regulation, particularly in regions with intensive farming and P-sensitive water bodies. The flexibility in DPS calculation methods could support UK soil testing laboratories and farm advisers in adopting practical P saturation screening protocols aligned with diffuse pollution risk assessment and nutrient management planning requirements.

Key measures

Four DPS indices: (AlOX + FeOX), (AlAL + FeAL), PSI with PAL, and PSI with POls; dissolved P measured by CaCl2 extraction (PCaCl2) and deionised water extraction (PW); Langmuir sorption maximum (Smax); single point P sorption index (PSI); clay content, pH and total carbon

Outcomes reported

The study compared four different degree of phosphorus saturation (DPS) indices in their ability to predict dissolved phosphorus (measured as PCaCl2 and PW) in soil extracts. It evaluated how well various methods for estimating phosphorus sorption capacity correlated with Langmuir sorption maximum values.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil fertility & nutrient management
Study type
Research
Study design
Comparative laboratory study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114708
Catalogue ID
SNmov5k7z1-vz6xjl

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.