Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology

Alasdair J. Sykes, Michael MacLeod, Vera Eory, Robert M. Rees, Florian Thomas Payen, Vasilis Myrgiotis, Mathew Williams, Saran Sohi, Jon Hillier, Dominic Moran, David A.C. Manning, Pietro Goglio, Michele Seghetta, Adrian Williams, Jim Harris, Marta Dondini, Jack Walton, Joanna I. House, Pete Smith

Global Change Biology · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This multidisciplinary systematic review evaluates soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology for agricultural systems, identifying five categories of implementable practices: productivity optimisation, reduced soil disturbance, minimised carbon removal, external carbon addition, and enhanced in-system carbon inputs. The authors synthesise biophysical, economic and social evidence to characterise implementation barriers, incentives and externalities at farm level, providing a framework to bridge the gap between global sequestration potential assessments and practical policy operationalisation.

UK applicability

The review's focus on farm-level implementation, UK-affiliated authorship (including researchers from Scottish Agricultural College and UK universities), and discussion of temperate cropping and grassland systems suggests direct relevance to UK agricultural policy and practice. The framework offers guidance for UK policymakers and land managers navigating the practical deployment of SCS measures compatible with food security objectives.

Key measures

Soil carbon sequestration potential; farm-level uptake compatibility; economic barriers and incentives; social and environmental externalities; technical quantification capacity

Outcomes reported

The study identifies specific soil carbon sequestration (SCS) practices with potential for positive farm-level impact and global uptake, categorised across five intervention types. It provides a multidisciplinary assessment of economic, non-cost barriers and incentives for land manager implementation, and evaluates potential externalised impacts of these measures.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1111/gcb.14844
Catalogue ID
SNmov5kxxj-lpvukq

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.