Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

An explicit definition of earthworm ecological categories – Marcel Bouché’s triangle revisited

Nicolas Bottinelli, Mickaël Hedde, Pascal Jouquet, Yvan Capowiez

Geoderma · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper formalises the long-standing but qualitative earthworm ecological classification scheme proposed by Marcel Bouché, which groups earthworms into functional categories based on habitat and behaviour (surface-dwelling, soil-dwelling, and burrowing types). The authors appear to develop explicit, operational definitions of these categories to improve their utility in soil ecology research and farm management. Such clarification supports more consistent assessment of soil biological function in farming systems.

UK applicability

UK agricultural and soil research communities regularly employ Bouché's classification framework in field studies and soil quality assessments. Explicit definitions would enhance consistency and comparability across UK-based soil biology monitoring and regenerative agriculture research.

Key measures

Earthworm ecological traits and categorisation criteria

Outcomes reported

The paper revisits and provides an explicit, quantitative definition of Bouché's classical earthworm ecological categories (epigeic, endogeic, anecic), as suggested by the title's reference to the foundational triangle framework.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Research
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114361
Catalogue ID
SNmoy148lc-9e2bgu

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.