Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Engineering the Plant Microenvironment To Facilitate Plant-Growth-Promoting Microbe Association

Augustine T. Zvinavashe, Ilham Mardad, Manal Mhada, Lamfeddal Kouisni, Benedetto Marelli

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review addresses critical barriers to effective plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) delivery in agricultural systems, including desiccation survival, precise root-zone targeting, and competition within the native rhizosphere. The authors propose engineering the seed spermosphere with proteinaceous and polysaccharide coatings as a scalable solution to facilitate PGPB colonisation and beneficial microbiome development. The paper synthesises recent technological advances in microbial inoculant delivery for both legume and cereal crops, whilst emphasising the role of policy and regulatory frameworks in promoting adoption of these sustainable alternatives to chemical inputs.

UK applicability

The approaches reviewed are applicable to UK cereal and legume production systems, particularly in contexts where reducing synthetic fertiliser inputs is a policy priority. However, regulatory pathways for microbe-coated seeds in the United Kingdom would need clarification, and field validation under UK soil and climatic conditions would be necessary before widespread uptake.

Key measures

Review of PGPB delivery mechanisms, microbial survival, root colonisation, and policy frameworks for agricultural adoption

Outcomes reported

This review synthesises advancements in precise and scalable delivery of plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) inoculants via seed microenvironment engineering with proteins and polysaccharides. It examines multifunctional rhizobacteria solutions applicable to both legumes and cereals, and discusses policy frameworks enabling technology adoption.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00138
Catalogue ID
SNmozbkt1p-pzkr8x

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.