Summary
This 2024 field study investigates how combining maize–mung bean intercropping with organic fertiliser application affects soil carbon dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions. The research suggests that integrated management—pairing intercropping with targeted organic amendments—may enhance nutrient cycling whilst supporting soil carbon storage and reducing net emissions. The findings contribute evidence on farm-level management strategies as pathways to advance soil health and climate resilience, though specific effect magnitudes and geographic transferability require consultation of the full paper.
UK applicability
The findings on intercropping and organic amendment effects may be partially applicable to UK arable systems, particularly in southern regions with suitable growing seasons for warm-season pulses. However, climate differences (temperature, rainfall patterns) and existing UK soil carbon status may limit direct transferability; UK-specific validation would be warranted before widespread adoption recommendations.
Key measures
Soil carbon stocks, greenhouse gas flux measurements (CO₂, CH₄, N₂O), soil nutrient content, intercrop yield, nutrient cycling rates
Outcomes reported
The study measured soil carbon dynamics, greenhouse gas emissions (primarily CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O), and nutrient cycling parameters under maize–mung bean intercropping with and without organic fertiliser application. It assessed how integrated management practices influence soil carbon storage and emission pathways at the field scale.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.