Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Beyond carbon sequestration: Swedish farmers' preferences and trade-offs between co-benefits of climate change mitigation measures

Harold Opdenbosch, Emilia Mattsson, Oyakhilomen Oyinbo, Jens Rommel, Helena Hansson, Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska

Ecological Economics · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions is a central policy concern in agriculture, reflected through voluntary contractual measures in the Common Agricultural Policy. The literature suggests that farmers' motivation for participating in mitigation measures does not necessarily originate in climate consciousness nor a sense of responsibility for mitigation, but rather in the co-benefits that they can bring. This paper investigates farmers' preferences for climate-related and non-climate co-benefits of mitigation measures, specifically carbon sequestration, biodiversity and soil health, using the cover cropping eco-scheme as a case study. We elicit trade-offs between monetary and non-monetary utility values associated with the co-benefits, alongside farmers' attitudes and identities, usi

Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109066
Catalogue ID
SNmp2b3ez4-i5h81t
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.