Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Soil health assessment: past accomplishments, current activities, and future opportunities

Karlen DL, Veum KS, Sudduth KA, Obrycki JF, Nunes MR

Soil Tillage Res · 2019.0

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This review by Karlen and colleagues, published in Soil and Tillage Research in 2019, synthesises progress in soil health assessment methodology from its conceptual origins through to contemporary frameworks and tools. The authors, based primarily at the USDA Agricultural Research Service, evaluate a range of biological, chemical, and physical indicators and the scoring approaches used to integrate them into composite indices. The paper is likely to identify outstanding methodological challenges — including standardisation, scalability, and sensitivity to management change — and to outline priorities for future assessment tool development.

UK applicability

Although the research draws primarily on a North American evidence base and institutional context, the methodological findings on soil health indicators and scoring frameworks are broadly relevant to UK soil health policy, including the development of assessment tools under agri-environment schemes such as Sustainable Farming Incentive. UK researchers and policymakers working on soil health metrics, including those informing the 25 Year Environment Plan targets, would find this review a useful reference point.

Key measures

Soil health indices; biological, chemical, and physical soil indicators; scoring functions; minimum data sets (MDS); soil quality index scores

Outcomes reported

The paper reviews the development and application of soil health assessment methodologies, evaluating existing frameworks and indicators used to evaluate soil function and quality over time. It likely identifies gaps in current assessment approaches and proposes priorities for future research and standardisation.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil health assessment & indicators
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable and mixed farming systems
DOI
10.1016/j.still.2019.104365
Catalogue ID
WP0022

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.