Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Association of dietary nitrate and nitrite from plant sources with digestive system cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long B, Jiang C, Liu Z, Wan P, Guo Q

Nutr Metab · 2025.0

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises evidence from observational studies to evaluate whether dietary nitrate and nitrite derived from plant sources are associated with altered risk of digestive system cancers. By restricting the analysis to plant-sourced nitrate and nitrite — distinct from processed meat sources — the study likely finds a neutral or potentially protective association, given the co-presence of antioxidants in plant foods. The review contributes to the ongoing scientific debate around dietary nitrates by disaggregating exposure by food source, which is methodologically important for interpreting cancer risk.

UK applicability

The findings are broadly applicable to UK dietary guidelines and public health policy, particularly in the context of recommendations to increase vegetable consumption; UK bodies such as the Food Standards Agency and NHS may draw on such evidence when communicating the safety and benefits of plant-rich diets relative to processed meat consumption.

Key measures

Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for digestive system cancer incidence; dietary nitrate and nitrite intake levels from plant sources

Outcomes reported

The study examined the association between dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite specifically from plant sources and the risk of digestive system cancers, including colorectal, gastric, and oesophageal cancers. Pooled risk estimates from eligible observational studies were calculated to determine whether plant-derived nitrate and nitrite confer protective or harmful effects.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Diet & cancer risk
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1186/s12986-025-00973-6
Catalogue ID
WP0125

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.