Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Wheat system × quality

Rempelos, L. et al.

2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, published in Foods in 2020 by Rempelos and colleagues, investigates how wheat production system — most likely contrasting organic and conventional management — affects the nutritional and quality composition of grain. The study appears to form part of a broader body of work from the Nafferton Factorial Systems Comparison (NFSC) or a related UK long-term field trial programme examining crop management effects on food quality. Findings likely contribute evidence that agronomic system choices, including fertilisation regime and crop protection inputs, have measurable effects on grain nutrient density and phytochemical profiles.

UK applicability

The research is highly applicable to the UK context, likely drawing on long-term UK field trial data and directly informing debates around organic versus conventional wheat production, grain quality standards, and the nutritional implications of agronomic policy choices under UK and post-Brexit agricultural frameworks.

Key measures

Grain mineral concentration (mg/kg); protein content (%); antioxidant capacity; phytochemical composition; yield (t/ha)

Outcomes reported

The study likely examined how different wheat production systems (organic vs. conventional, and crop management variables such as fertiliser and pesticide inputs) influence grain quality parameters including nutrient, mineral, and phytochemical composition. Key outcomes probably include differences in protein, mineral concentration, and antioxidant-related compounds across production systems.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Arable crop quality & nutrient composition
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
UK
System type
Arable cereals
Catalogue ID
XL0156

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.