Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

A comprehensive review on salt and health

He, F.J. & MacGregor, G.A.

2009

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This comprehensive narrative review by He and MacGregor, published in the Journal of Human Hypertension in 2009, synthesises the epidemiological, clinical, and mechanistic evidence linking high dietary salt intake to elevated blood pressure and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke. The authors, who are prominent advocates for salt reduction policy, draw on a broad body of research to argue that population-wide reductions in salt intake would yield substantial public health benefits. The review is widely cited in discussions of dietary guidelines and public health nutrition policy.

UK applicability

Highly applicable to the UK context: He and MacGregor are based at Queen Mary University of London and have been influential in shaping UK salt reduction policy, including initiatives led by the Food Standards Agency and later Public Health England. The findings directly inform UK dietary guidelines recommending no more than 6g of salt per day for adults.

Key measures

Blood pressure (mmHg); cardiovascular disease risk; stroke incidence; dietary sodium intake (g/day); population-level salt consumption estimates

Outcomes reported

The review examined the relationship between dietary salt (sodium chloride) intake and blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and other adverse health outcomes across populations. It also likely assessed the evidence base for salt reduction strategies and their potential public health benefits.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary minerals & cardiovascular health
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
Catalogue ID
XL0161

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.