Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Microbiome terminology consensus

Sanders, M.E. et al.

2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, published in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, addresses longstanding inconsistency in the use of microbiome-related terminology across the biomedical and nutritional sciences. Sanders and colleagues convened expert opinion to propose standardised definitions for terms such as microbiome, probiotics, prebiotics and postbiotics, aiming to improve precision in research, clinical practice and regulatory communication. The work is likely to function as a reference document for researchers and policymakers navigating an increasingly crowded and commercially influenced field.

UK applicability

The consensus definitions proposed are intended for international application and are directly relevant to UK researchers, clinicians and food regulators, including those working within MHRA, FSA or NICE frameworks where precise terminology is required for product claims and clinical guidance.

Key measures

Definitional frameworks and terminological criteria for microbiome-related concepts; expert consensus positions

Outcomes reported

The paper sought to establish agreed definitions for key microbiome-related terms including microbiome, microbiota, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics, drawing on expert consensus to reduce ambiguity in the scientific literature.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Gut microbiome & microbial health
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
Catalogue ID
XL0179

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.