Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

White PJ, Broadley MR. 2005. Historical variation in the mineral composition of edible horticultural products. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 80(6):660-667

2005

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

White and Broadley (2005) reviewed historical food composition data to evaluate whether the mineral content of edible horticultural products has changed over the twentieth century. The paper likely draws on UK food composition tables and comparable national datasets to identify temporal trends, considering agronomic, genetic, and methodological explanations for apparent declines. It contributes to the broader scientific debate on nutrient density change in food crops and the adequacy of modern diets in meeting mineral requirements.

UK applicability

This paper is directly applicable to UK conditions, drawing primarily on UK food composition data and published in a UK-based horticultural science journal. Its findings are relevant to UK policy discussions on dietary mineral sufficiency, crop breeding priorities, and sustainable horticultural practice.

Key measures

Mineral concentrations (mg per 100 g fresh weight) of key elements including calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, and zinc across historical food composition datasets

Outcomes reported

The study examined changes in the mineral concentrations of edible horticultural products — including vegetables and fruit — by comparing historical food composition data across decades. It assessed whether mineral content has declined over time and considered the potential causes of any observed variation.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Fruit & vegetables
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
UK
System type
Horticulture
Catalogue ID
XL0202

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.