Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues: Summary Report 2024

FAO/WHO

2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This report summarises the outcomes of the 2024 session of the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues, an internationally recognised expert body that conducts independent scientific evaluations of pesticide residues in food. It provides recommended MRLs, toxicological reference values, and dietary exposure estimates intended to inform Codex Alimentarius standards and national regulatory frameworks. The report serves as a key reference for food safety authorities and regulators seeking evidence-based guidance on acceptable pesticide residue levels in commodities traded internationally.

UK applicability

Although the UK operates its own statutory MRL framework via the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Food Standards Agency (FSA) following its departure from the EU, JMPR recommendations continue to inform UK regulatory positions, particularly for imported commodities and Codex-aligned trade standards. UK food safety bodies routinely consider JMPR evaluations when reviewing or updating domestic MRLs.

Key measures

Maximum residue limits (MRLs, mg/kg); acceptable daily intakes (ADIs); acute reference doses (ARfDs); estimated dietary intake as percentage of ADI

Outcomes reported

The report summarises the findings of the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR), covering toxicological evaluations of pesticide compounds, recommended maximum residue limits (MRLs), and assessments of long-term and short-term dietary exposure for general and vulnerable populations.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Pesticide regulation & food safety standards
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Industry/policy report
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Food supply chain
Catalogue ID
XL0229

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.