Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Vitamin C degradation kinetics

Rico, D. et al.

2007

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, published in the Journal of Food Engineering in 2007, investigates the kinetics of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) degradation in food — most likely fresh-cut produce — as a function of storage time and temperature. Rico et al. apply mathematical modelling to characterise the rate and pattern of nutrient loss, providing quantitative parameters that describe how rapidly ascorbic acid diminishes under different conditions. The findings are likely to be of relevance to post-harvest management and supply chain design, where minimising nutrient loss is a practical concern.

UK applicability

The kinetic modelling approach and findings are broadly applicable to UK food supply chain and retail contexts, where fresh-cut and minimally processed vegetables are widely consumed and stored under chilled conditions; the results may inform cold-chain management and packaging decisions relevant to UK produce retailers and processors.

Key measures

Ascorbic acid concentration (mg/100g or mg/kg); degradation rate constants (k); half-life (t½); temperature coefficients (Q10 or activation energy, Ea)

Outcomes reported

The study examined the rate and pattern of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) degradation in food products, likely fresh-cut vegetables, under varying temperature or atmospheric conditions. It reports kinetic parameters such as rate constants and half-life values describing nutrient loss over time.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Nutrient retention & food processing
Study type
Research
Study design
Laboratory experiment
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Food supply chain
Catalogue ID
XL0263

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.