Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Yield gap between organic & conventional

De Ponti, T. et al.

2012

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

De Ponti et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis synthesising data from a large number of published studies to estimate the yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems. The analysis, published in Agricultural Systems, found that organic yields are on average approximately 80% of conventional yields, though the gap varies considerably by crop type and location. The paper provides a quantitative baseline for policy discussions on the land-use implications of transitioning to organic production at scale.

UK applicability

The findings are broadly applicable to UK agricultural policy, particularly in the context of debates around the Environmental Land Management scheme and the potential land-use trade-offs of expanding organic farming in England, Scotland, and Wales. UK-specific yield ratios may differ from global averages due to climate, soil type, and existing farm management practices.

Key measures

Organic-to-conventional yield ratio; crop-specific yield differentials; number of paired observations across studies

Outcomes reported

The study quantified the yield difference between organic and conventional farming across a wide range of crops and regions, reporting an average yield ratio of organic relative to conventional production. It examined how the yield gap varies by crop type, region, and management context.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Organic vs conventional farming systems
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed arable and horticultural
Catalogue ID
XL0395

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.