Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Worthington V. 2001. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 7(2):161-173

2001

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This meta-analysis by Worthington (2001) synthesised available comparative data on the nutritional composition of organically and conventionally produced plant foods. The analysis likely found statistically significant differences in favour of organic production for a range of nutrients, including minerals and vitamin C, whilst conventional produce may have shown higher nitrate content. The paper represents an early systematic attempt to quantify nutritional differences between production systems and has been widely cited in subsequent debates on organic food quality.

UK applicability

Although the study draws on international data rather than UK-specific trials, its findings are broadly applicable to UK policy discussions around organic farming standards and food quality, and inform ongoing debates within UK agriculture and public health nutrition.

Key measures

Nutrient concentrations including vitamins (e.g. vitamin C), minerals (e.g. iron, magnesium, calcium), nitrate levels, and total nutrient content across food categories (fruits, vegetables, grains)

Outcomes reported

The study compared nutrient concentrations in organically and conventionally produced fruits, vegetables and grains, examining differences in vitamins, minerals and other nutritionally relevant compounds. It likely reported that organic produce contained higher levels of several key nutrients relative to conventionally grown equivalents.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Organic food & nutrient density
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Horticulture
Catalogue ID
XL0631

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.