Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Human exposure to pesticides in urban diets: monitoring data 2015–2020

Vink, J.P. et al.

2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Published in Food and Chemical Toxicology, this paper presents a multi-year dietary exposure assessment of pesticide residues in urban food consumption, drawing on national food monitoring data from 2015 to 2020. It likely applies probabilistic or deterministic modelling to estimate consumer exposure relative to established toxicological thresholds. The study contributes longitudinal evidence on trends in dietary pesticide burden, which is relevant to regulatory review and public health risk communication.

UK applicability

While the study appears to be based on Dutch monitoring data, the methodology and findings are broadly applicable to UK food safety policy, particularly given comparable EU-derived pesticide maximum residue level (MRL) frameworks that the UK retained post-Brexit. The UK's Health and Safety Executive and Food Standards Agency conduct analogous residue monitoring, and this paper may serve as a useful methodological benchmark.

Key measures

Pesticide residue concentrations in food commodities (µg/kg); estimated daily intake (EDI); acceptable daily intake (ADI) exceedance rates; hazard quotients

Outcomes reported

The study reports estimated human dietary exposure to pesticide residues using food monitoring data collected between 2015 and 2020, likely assessing whether exposure levels exceed toxicological reference values for urban consumers.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Pesticide residues & dietary risk
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational monitoring study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Netherlands
System type
Food supply chain
Catalogue ID
XL0648

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.