Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Preharvest food safety

Oliver, S.P. et al.

2005

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Published as a supplement to the Journal of Dairy Science, this review by Oliver et al. (2005) examines food safety hazards arising at the preharvest stage — prior to slaughter or milk processing — with a likely focus on dairy cattle systems. The paper identifies key microbial pathogens of concern, their on-farm reservoirs, and the management strategies available to producers to reduce contamination risk. As a supplement article spanning E1–E23, it is likely a comprehensive, invited review intended to inform both research priorities and producer guidance.

UK applicability

While the paper is likely US-centric given the Journal of Dairy Science context, its coverage of preharvest pathogen control is broadly applicable to UK dairy and livestock systems, where farm-level food safety management is regulated under Food Standards Agency and Defra frameworks.

Key measures

Pathogen prevalence; contamination sources; on-farm intervention efficacy; risk factors for preharvest contamination

Outcomes reported

The paper likely reviews preharvest sources of microbial contamination — including pathogens such as E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria — and evaluates interventions to reduce food safety risks before produce or milk enters the processing chain. It probably assesses the efficacy of on-farm management practices in reducing pathogen prevalence.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Food safety & microbial risk
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Dairy and livestock production
Catalogue ID
XL0666

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.