Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Ginger and human health: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

K.R. Paudel et al.

2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This umbrella systematic review by Paudel et al. (2025) consolidates evidence from published meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials to provide a high-level synthesis of ginger's effects on human health across multiple outcomes and conditions. By appraising the quality and consistency of existing meta-analytic evidence, it offers a structured overview of where the clinical evidence base for ginger is robust, inconsistent, or limited. This type of review is particularly valuable for identifying priority areas for future research and informing evidence-based dietary or supplementation guidance.

UK applicability

Whilst the underlying trials are likely drawn from diverse international settings, the synthesised findings on ginger supplementation are broadly applicable to UK clinical and public health contexts, particularly given growing interest in functional foods and botanical supplements within NHS dietary guidance and UK nutrition research.

Key measures

Likely includes: fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), HbA1c (%), lipid markers (LDL, HDL, triglycerides in mmol/L), inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6), body weight (kg), BMI (kg/m²), nausea severity scores; effect sizes (SMD, MD, 95% CI) from pooled RCT data

Outcomes reported

The review synthesised findings from multiple meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials examining the effects of ginger supplementation on a range of health outcomes, likely including glycaemic control, lipid profiles, inflammation, nausea, and body weight. It assessed the breadth and consistency of evidence across different clinical populations and conditions.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Functional foods & botanical supplements
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review of meta-analyses
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Human clinical
Catalogue ID
XL0689

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.