Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Durst RW, Weaver GW. 2013. Nutritional content of fresh and canned peaches. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93(3):593-603

2013

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2013 comparative study by Durst and Weaver analysed the nutritional composition of fresh and canned peaches to assess how thermal processing and preservation affect nutrient retention. Whilst canning typically reduces heat-sensitive vitamins such as ascorbic acid, the research provides empirical evidence suggesting that canned peaches retain substantial levels of minerals and certain phytochemicals. The findings contribute to understanding the nutritional trade-offs between fresh and processed fruit formats.

Regional applicability

Peaches are not a staple UK crop; findings are most relevant to consumers and retailers evaluating the relative nutritional merit of imported fresh versus canned peaches available in UK food environments. The data may inform public health messaging around processed fruit consumption where fresh alternatives are limited or costly.

Key measures

Vitamin content (particularly ascorbic acid/vitamin C), mineral composition, and phytochemical levels in fresh versus canned peaches

Outcomes reported

The study compared the nutritional composition of fresh peaches with canned peaches to quantify how thermal processing and preservation methods affect retention of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals. The research measured levels of heat-sensitive nutrients and stable micronutrients across both product forms.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Food processing & bioavailability
Study type
Research
Study design
Comparative laboratory analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Horticulture
Catalogue ID
XL0844

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.