Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals: global progress

Van Boeckel, T.P. et al.

2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper by Van Boeckel and colleagues, published in Science, reviews global progress in reducing antimicrobial use in food animals in response to growing concerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The authors likely assess the extent to which regulatory interventions, voluntary commitments, and international frameworks have translated into measurable reductions in veterinary antibiotic consumption. The paper situates national-level progress within the broader One Health agenda, highlighting disparities between high-income and low- and middle-income countries.

UK applicability

The findings are broadly applicable to the UK, which has made notable progress in reducing veterinary antibiotic use through the Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture (RUMA) Alliance targets and Veterinary Medicines Directorate monitoring. Post-Brexit, UK policy on AMR in agriculture continues to align with international benchmarks discussed in this literature.

Key measures

Antimicrobial consumption (mg/kg of animal biomass); national policy adoption rates; changes in antimicrobial use over time by country and region

Outcomes reported

The study assessed trends in antimicrobial consumption in food animals across multiple countries, examining the progress made following national and international policy interventions to restrict or reduce antibiotic use in livestock production.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Antimicrobial resistance & veterinary medicine policy
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Mixed livestock
Catalogue ID
XL0945

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.