Summary
This widely cited Nature paper by Reganold and colleagues provides a comparative assessment of organic and conventional farming systems across multiple sustainability dimensions. The authors likely draw on field trial data and published literature to evaluate trade-offs between productivity, soil health, biodiversity, and economic viability. The paper is broadly considered a landmark contribution to the evidence base supporting organic farming's environmental and agronomic credentials, whilst acknowledging yield gaps relative to conventional systems.
UK applicability
Although the study draws on international evidence, its findings on soil health, biodiversity, and energy efficiency are broadly applicable to UK arable and mixed farming contexts, and have informed UK and European policy debates around agri-environment schemes and the transition to more sustainable farming systems.
Key measures
Soil organic matter; biodiversity indices; energy efficiency; yield comparisons; farm profitability; environmental impact indicators
Outcomes reported
The study compared organic and conventional farming systems across sustainability indicators including soil health, biodiversity, economics, energy use, and yields. It assessed the relative performance of each system against long-term agronomic and environmental benchmarks.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.