Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Onion: organic vs conventional

Rempelos, L. et al.

2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, published in Frontiers in Nutrition in 2019 by Rempelos and colleagues, examines differences in nutritional and phytochemical profiles between organically and conventionally grown onions. The study likely contributes evidence to the broader debate on whether organic production systems yield crops with superior secondary metabolite concentrations, consistent with the crop stress hypothesis. Findings would be relevant to researchers and practitioners assessing the human health implications of production system choice for vegetable crops.

UK applicability

Rempelos and colleagues are affiliated with UK institutions, and this work is likely conducted within a European or UK context, making findings directly relevant to UK horticultural practice and ongoing policy debates around organic standards and food quality.

Key measures

Polyphenol content (mg/kg fresh weight); flavonoid concentration (e.g. quercetin derivatives); antioxidant capacity; potentially mineral content (mg/kg)

Outcomes reported

The study likely compared concentrations of polyphenols, flavonoids (particularly quercetin), antioxidant activity, and potentially macro- and micronutrients in organically and conventionally produced onions. It may also have examined the influence of agronomic practices on these compositional differences.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Fruit & vegetables
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Horticulture
Catalogue ID
XL0979

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.