Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Effects of pre-existing psychiatric illness on traumatic brain injury outcomes: A propensity-matched cohort study

Francisco Benavides, Jorge Liporaci, John Getchell, Jason Weinberger, Richard Caplan, Elianne Rojas, Andrea Kaspresnki, Luis Cardenas

Trauma · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This retrospective cohort study from a United States level 1 trauma centre examined 5,343 traumatic brain injury patients between 2012 and 2020, of whom 977 (18%) had pre-existing psychiatric disorders. Using propensity-score matching to control for confounding, the authors found that patients with pre-existing psychiatric illness experienced significantly longer hospitalisation and ICU stays, suggesting psychiatric comorbidity may complicate recovery trajectories following TBI.

UK applicability

The findings are potentially relevant to UK trauma services and mental health integration pathways, though direct application would require validation in UK healthcare settings with potentially different case-mix and psychiatric service availability. UK trauma centres and psychiatric liaison services may benefit from awareness of this comorbidity effect.

Key measures

Hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, ventilator days, clinical outcomes in TBI patients with and without pre-existing psychiatric illness

Outcomes reported

The study measured hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ventilator days, and clinical outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients stratified by pre-existing psychiatric disorder status.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1177/14604086231187157
Catalogue ID
BFmobghr9o-ggjw96

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.