Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Progress in Design and Testing of the DAQ and Data-Flow Control for the Phase-2 Upgrade of the CMS Experiment

Vasileios Amoiridis, U. Behrens, Andrea Bocci, James Branson, Philipp Brummer, E. Cano, Sergio Cittolin, Diego Da Silva-Gomes, J Almeida, Georgiana-Lavinia Darlea, Christian Deldicque, Marc Dobson, D. Gigi, F. Glege, G. Gomez Ceballos, Neven Gutić, Magnus Hansen, J. Hegeman, Guillermo Izquierdo Moreno, Carles Kishimoto, R. D. Krawczyk, W. Li, K. Long, F. Meijers, E. Meschi, Srećko Morović, L. Orsini, Christoph Paus, K. Peron, Andrea Petrucci, M. Pieri, Alexandros Poupakis, Dinyar Rabady, A. Rácz, Hannes Sakulin, Christoph Schwick, Dainius Šimelevičius, J. Troska, Cristina Vazquez-Velez, P. Zejdl

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper is not relevant to Vitagri's Pulse Brain catalogue. It describes the technical design and testing of data acquisition and control systems for the CMS particle physics detector upgrade at CERN's High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider, scheduled for 2029. The work addresses hardware engineering, trigger architecture, and data flow optimisation for high-energy physics experiments, with no connection to farming systems, soil health, nutrient density, or human nutrition.

UK applicability

Not applicable. This is fundamental particle physics instrumentation research with no bearing on agricultural or nutritional science.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.1109/tns.2023.3244696
Catalogue ID
BFmoc27ol1-zyyfnr

Topic tags

particle physicscerndetector upgradedata acquisitionhigh-energy physics
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.

What does the evidence say about Other / interdisciplinary?→How does this finding apply in a UK context?→What are the most cited records on this topic?→

Related evidence