L. M. Cardenas, A. Bhogal, David R. Chadwick, Karen McGeough, T. H. Misselbrook, Robert M. Rees, R. E. Thorman, Catherine J. Watson, J. R. Williams, Keith A. Smith, S. Calvet

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.082

Summary

O emissions tended to be lower when urea was applied instead of AN or CAN, and were particularly reduced when using urea with DCD. Finally, correlations between the factors studied showed that total N input was related to Nofftake and Nexcess; while cumulative emissions and EF were related to yield scaled emissions.

Subject: Grassland & pasture systems
Source type: Peer-reviewed study
System type: Other
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.082
Catalogue ID: BFmokjnvkq-d128it

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.

What does the evidence say about Grassland & pasture systems?→How does this finding apply in a UK context?→What are the most cited records on this topic?→

Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrous oxide emissions from five UK fertilised grasslands

Summary

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Related evidence