Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Exergy intensity and environmental consequences of the medical face masks curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic: Malign bodyguard?

Meisam Tabatabaei, Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Yi Yang, Mortaza Aghbashlo, Su Shiung Lam, Hugh Montgomery, Wanxi Peng

Journal of Cleaner Production · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2021 paper examines the paradox of medical face masks as protective pandemic tools that simultaneously pose environmental challenges. Using exergy analysis and lifecycle assessment approaches, the authors evaluate the resource intensity and waste implications of mass-scale mask production and disposal during COVID-19. The work contributes to understanding trade-offs between immediate public health interventions and broader environmental sustainability.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK waste management and environmental policy, particularly regarding single-use protective equipment disposal protocols established during and after the pandemic. The analysis may inform future decisions on balancing pandemic preparedness with circular economy principles.

Key measures

Exergy intensity; environmental consequences; lifecycle impacts of face mask production and disposal

Outcomes reported

The study assessed the exergy intensity and environmental consequences of medical face mask production and disposal during the COVID-19 pandemic. It examined whether widespread mask use, whilst protective against viral transmission, created significant environmental burdens.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127880
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo2bz-gvcz9t

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.