Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryGrey literature

“Energy Dominance” is Un-American

David M. Hart

2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Hart's 2017 commentary, published by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, presents a critical analysis of the 'energy dominance' doctrine in U.S. foreign policy. The paper argues, as suggested by the title, that this approach conflicts with foundational American values and principles. The work appears to situate energy policy within broader questions of geopolitical strategy and values alignment, though without access to the full text, the specific analytical framework remains inferred.

UK applicability

Limited direct applicability to UK farming or soil health. The paper addresses U.S. energy doctrine and may have tangential relevance to UK–U.S. energy and trade relations, but does not appear to address agricultural systems, soil health, or nutrition.

Key measures

Conceptual and rhetorical analysis of energy policy doctrine; alignment with stated American principles

Outcomes reported

The paper critiques the strategic doctrine of 'energy dominance' as articulated in U.S. policy, examining its consistency with American historical values and international commitments.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Policy commentary
Source type
Grey literature
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo2nj-6zv79a

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.