Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

DOE Research, Development and Demonstration Funding: Keep on Growin'

Colin Cunliff, David M. Hart

2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Cunliff and Hart's 2018 policy report examines United States Department of Energy funding for agricultural research, development and demonstration activities. The analysis contextualises DOE's role within the broader US agricultural research landscape and appears to make a case for continued or expanded investment in DOE-supported agricultural innovation. The authors suggest such funding supports productivity and resilience in farming systems, though the specific evidence and programmes cited would require review of the full text.

UK applicability

Whilst this report focuses on US DOE funding mechanisms and policy, the strategic arguments regarding public investment in agricultural innovation and research infrastructure may inform UK policy discussions around research funding allocation. However, direct applicability is limited given differences in institutional structure and funding systems between the two countries.

Key measures

DOE funding amounts and allocation across agricultural research programmes; policy analysis of funding mechanisms and rationale

Outcomes reported

The report examines the scope, allocation and strategic rationale for DOE funding directed towards agricultural research, development and demonstration activities. It appears to assess how DOE investments support innovation in farming systems and the case for sustained or expanded funding.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmokjo2nj-zsxdjo

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.