Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Improving Oral Health care Using Academic Detailing—Reproducibility and Scalability of the Added Value for Oral Care Field Studies Approach

Kasper Rosing, Fatiha Baâdoudi, Denise Duijster, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden, Fatima M. Ali, Neal Maskrey

Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

OBJECTIVES: A proof-of-concept study has shown that the Added Value for Oral Care (ADVOCATE) Field Studies approach (academic detailing with feedback data) is considered a feasible, useful, and acceptable way to motivate general dental practitioners (GDPs) to reflect on and, if required, change their oral health-care delivery. The aims of this proof-of-principle study were to test whether such results were reproducible and to reach consensus among stakeholders on recommendations for wider implementation. METHODS: Eleven groups of GDPs were recruited in 6 countries (Denmark, England Germany, Hungary, Ireland, and The Netherlands). Each group had 3 academic detailing meetings, being stimulated by feedback data. Focus group interviews were held to evaluate the reproducibility of the Field Stu

Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101474
Catalogue ID
BFmokjob7i-hz83o2
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.