Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

Malcolm J. Moore, David Goldstein, John Hamm, Arié Figer, J. Randolph Hecht, Steven Gallinger, H. Au, P. Murawa, David Walde, Robert A. Wolff, Daniel de Castro, Robert Lim, Keyue Ding, Gary M. Clark, Theodora Voskoglou-Nomikos, Mieke Ptasynski, Wendy R. Parulekar

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis and there have been no improvements in survival since the introduction of gemcitabine in 1996. Pancreatic tumors often overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor type 1 (HER1/EGFR) and this is associated with a worse prognosis. We studied the effects of adding the HER1/EGFR-targeted agent erlotinib to gemcitabine in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard gemcitabine plus erlotinib (100 or 150 mg/d orally) or gemcitabine plus placebo in a double-blind, international phase III trial. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: = .004). Objective response rates were not significantly diffe

Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1200/jco.22.02770
Catalogue ID
BFmokjoe04-rg6ily
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.