Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2020 commentary in Nature Food, authored by an international consortium of soil and food systems researchers, argues that agricultural research conferences should adopt more sustainable operational practices to reduce their environmental impact. The authors propose systematic measures including virtual participation, reduced travel requirements, and resource-efficient event design. The paper highlights an apparent contradiction between the research community's advocacy for sustainable food and farming systems and the carbon-intensive nature of traditional large in-person research meetings.

UK applicability

UK-based agricultural and food systems researchers attending international conferences would benefit from these proposals. The recommendations are particularly relevant to UK research institutions and funding bodies (such as BBSRC, NERC) that convene or support multi-national research networks and would face reduced travel and associated costs under such reforms.

Key measures

Carbon footprint of conferences; prevalence of virtual participation options; travel-related emissions from researcher attendance

Outcomes reported

The paper examines the environmental footprint of international agricultural research meetings and proposes operational changes to reduce carbon intensity. It reports on current practices and barriers to adoption of more sustainable meeting formats among the research community.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmokjof1a-wldxfw

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.