Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy report

Energy Storage RD&D in the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Proposal

David M. Hart

2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This policy report, authored by David M. Hart of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, analyses the United States federal government's proposed research, development and demonstration (RD&D) funding for energy storage technologies in the fiscal year 2020 budget. The report likely assesses current funding levels, identifies gaps in energy storage innovation portfolios, and makes recommendations for strategic federal investment to advance battery and storage technologies. As a policy document rather than experimental research, it contributes to understanding the landscape of energy storage innovation policy in the United States.

UK applicability

Whilst this report focuses on US federal funding mechanisms and budget processes, the underlying energy storage technology challenges and RD&D priorities identified may have relevance to UK innovation policy and competitiveness in energy storage sectors. However, UK policy makers would need to assess applicability within the UK's distinct funding structures and energy transition strategies.

Key measures

Proposed budget allocations for energy storage RD&D programmes; funding priorities and policy recommendations

Outcomes reported

Policy analysis of proposed federal research funding for energy storage technologies in the 2020 US budget cycle. The report examines budget allocations and research priorities for energy storage development.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmommpbgs-4hlnzb

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.