Summary
This invited opinion paper, authored by leading animal behaviour researchers Provenza and Gregorini, argues that contemporary food systems structurally undermine the capacity of both herbivores and humans to exercise meaningful dietary choice. The paper, published in a New Zealand animal science forum in 2018, appears to critique industrial farming and food production models that remove agency from both animals and consumers, suggesting that such constraints have detrimentary effects on health and welfare outcomes.
UK applicability
The critique of industrialised food systems and constraints on dietary choice is broadly applicable to UK farming and food environments. UK agricultural and food policy increasingly emphasises both animal welfare and sustainable diets, making the paper's argument on dietary autonomy and health outcomes relevant to ongoing UK food system reform discussions.
Key measures
Not determinable from metadata; likely qualitative analysis of food system structures and their effects on dietary autonomy.
Outcomes reported
As suggested by the title, the paper examines structural barriers within food systems that constrain dietary choice for both herbivores (livestock) and human consumers. The analysis likely critiques how industrial food systems limit access to diverse, self-selected diets.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.