Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryGrey literature

Issues of cross-cultural variations in cyber bullying across Europe and beyond

Peter K. Smith, Anke Görzig, Susanne Robinson

UWL Repository (University of West London) · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper, presented as a repository item from the University of West London, examines cross-cultural and cross-national variations in cyberbullying prevalence and characteristics. The authors review research from Western countries alongside emerging studies from Asian Pacific Rim and South-East Asian regions, interrogating methodological challenges in comparing cyberbullying rates and manifestations across different cultural and national contexts. The work addresses how societal factors may explain observed differences in bullying and victimisation experiences between countries.

UK applicability

The paper's comparative framework is applicable to understanding how cyberbullying in the United Kingdom compares to international prevalence and characteristics, and may inform UK policy and safeguarding approaches by contextualising domestic findings within a broader cross-cultural perspective.

Key measures

Cyberbullying prevalence rates, victim rates, age and gender characteristics of bullying experiences across countries

Outcomes reported

The paper examines societal and cross-national variations in cyberbullying and victimisation rates, alongside associated characteristics such as age and gender differences. As suggested by the title and abstract fragment, it compares the phenomenon of cyberbullying across different countries and explores methodological challenges in such comparisons.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Grey literature
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmommphdp-360j6o

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.