Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Peer-reviewed

FORT-1: Phase II/III Study of Rogaratinib Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Selected Based on <i>FGFR1</i>/<i>3</i> mRNA Expression

Cora N. Sternberg, Daniel P. Petrylak, Joaquim Bellmunt, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Andrea Necchi, Howard Gurney, Jae‐Lyun Lee, Michiel S. van der Heijden, Eli Rosenbaum, Nicolas Penel, See‐Tong Pang, Jian‐Ri Li, Xavier García del Muro, Florence Joly, Zsuzsanna Pápai, Weichao Bao, Peter Ellinghaus, Chengxing Lu, Mitchell Robert Sierecki, Sabine Coppieters, Keiko Nakajima, Tatiane Cristine Ishida, David I. Quinn

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

PURPOSE: mRNA-positive advanced/metastatic UC previously treated with platinum chemotherapy. METHODS: intravenously once every 3 weeks; n = 88). The primary end point was overall survival, with objective response rate (ORR) analysis planned following phase II accrual. Because of comparable efficacy between treatments, enrollment was stopped before progression to phase III; a full interim analysis of phase II was completed. RESULTS: DNA alterations showed ORRs of 52.4% (11/21; 95% CI, 29.8 to 74.3) for rogaratinib and 26.7% (4/15; 95% CI, 7.8 to 55.1) for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: mRNA overexpression may be better predictors of rogaratinib response.

Subject
Arable cropping systems
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
System type
Other
DOI
10.1200/jco.21.02303
Catalogue ID
BFmommpjky-ahupat
Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.