Summary
Behrens and Poore examine the currently fragmented approaches to defining food system boundaries across research, policy, and practice contexts. As suggested by the title, the paper identifies that these boundaries lack standardised or coherent definition, which may impede comparison and integration of findings across the food systems literature. This work appears to offer a critical methodological contribution to clarifying how food system scope should be operationalised.
UK applicability
The findings are likely relevant to UK food policy and research design, particularly for efforts to develop integrated food strategies and assess farm-to-fork environmental or health impacts consistently across studies and interventions.
Key measures
Definitional frameworks for food system boundaries; methodological approaches to boundary-setting in food systems research
Outcomes reported
The paper examines how food system boundaries are currently conceptualised and measured across research and policy contexts. It likely identifies inconsistencies or gaps in how these boundaries are defined.
Topic tags
Dig deeper with Pulse AI.
Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.