Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Research meetings must be more sustainable

Alberto Sanz-Cobeña, Roberta Alessandrini, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Marco Springmann, Eduardo Aguilera, Barbara Amon, Fabio Bartolini, Markus Geupel, Bruna Grizzetti, Susanna Kugelberg, Catharina Latka, Liang Xia, Anna Birgitte Milford, Patrick Musinguzi, Ee Ling Ng, Helen Suter, Adrian Leip

Nature Food · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2020 commentary in Nature Food, authored by a multi-institutional European research group, examines the sustainability implications of in-person research meetings and conferences. The paper appears to argue for more environmentally conscious approaches to academic gatherings, though the specific interventions or findings cannot be determined from the title alone. The work was likely prompted by growing awareness of the carbon footprint of international scientific conferences.

UK applicability

The findings would be relevant to UK-based research institutions and funding bodies seeking to reduce the environmental impact of their conference participation and internal meetings. This aligns with UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and institutional sustainability commitments.

Key measures

As suggested by the title, likely carbon emissions, travel-related impacts, or resource use associated with in-person research meetings

Outcomes reported

The paper likely discusses the environmental footprint of research meetings and conferences, and proposes or evaluates strategies to reduce their carbon emissions and resource consumption.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Commentary
Study design
Commentary
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Other
DOI
10.1038/s43016-020-0065-2
Catalogue ID
BFmommpma7-g6s252

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.