Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Exergy intensity and environmental consequences of the medical face masks curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic: Malign bodyguard?

Meisam Tabatabaei, Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Yi Yang, Mortaza Aghbashlo, Su Shiung Lam, Hugh Montgomery, Wanxi Peng

Journal of Cleaner Production · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2021 analysis examines the exergy intensity and broader environmental consequences of the massive global deployment of disposable medical face masks as a COVID-19 control measure. The paper, as suggested by its title, weighs the public health benefits of masks against their material and energy costs across the product lifecycle. The work contributes to understanding trade-offs between pandemic control interventions and environmental sustainability.

UK applicability

The findings would be relevant to UK environmental and public health policy regarding pandemic preparedness and the sustainability of large-scale disposable protective equipment strategies. The analysis may inform future guidance on balancing disease control with circular economy and waste reduction objectives.

Key measures

Exergy intensity; environmental footprint metrics; lifecycle energy demand; waste generation from mask production and disposal

Outcomes reported

The study analysed the exergy intensity (embodied energy demand) and environmental consequences associated with the production, use and disposal of medical face masks deployed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research evaluated whether widespread mask use represented a net environmental benefit or burden.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Life cycle assessment / Exergy analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127880
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g48f-0c2sgr

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.