Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Perceptions and outcomes of conventional vs. organic apple orchard management

Robert J. Orpet, Vincent P. Jones, E. H. Beers, John P. Reganold, Jessica R. Goldberger, David W. Crowder

Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2019 comparative field study, authored by leading agricultural researchers including Reganold (a prominent organic systems researcher), examined outcomes and grower perceptions in conventional versus organic apple orchards. The work appears to integrate agronomic performance, economic returns, and environmental assessment across orchard management approaches. The findings contribute to evidence on trade-offs and synergies between production systems in commercial fruit cultivation.

UK applicability

UK apple production operates under different pest pressure, climate, and regulatory frameworks than United States orchards; however, comparative management principles and economic trade-off analysis may inform UK organic certification and integrated fruit production policy.

Key measures

Pest populations, yield, profitability, environmental metrics, and grower perceptions of management systems

Outcomes reported

The study examined perceptions and measured outcomes of orchard management practices, profitability, pest management efficacy, and environmental indicators across conventional and organic apple production systems.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Fruit & vegetables
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Horticulture
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2019.106723
Catalogue ID
BFmor3g7fe-jo6t6n

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.