Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Frequency and Predictors of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes

Ralf E. Harskamp, John H. Alexander, T. Bruce Ferguson, Rebecca Hager, Michael J. Mack, Brian R. Englum, Daniel Wojdyla, Phillip J. Schulte, Nicholas T. Kouchoukos, Robbert J. de Winter, C. Michael Gibson, Eric D. Peterson, Robert A. Harrington, Peter K. Smith, Renato D. Lópes

Circulation · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This observational analysis of 1539 participants from the PREVENT IV trial identified internal mammary artery graft failure in 8.6% of cases at 12–18 months post-coronary artery bypass grafting. Left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis <75%, the presence of an additional bypass graft to the diagonal branch, and absence of diabetes mellitus were significant predictors of IMA failure. IMA failure was associated with substantially higher rates of repeat revascularisation, raising concerns about the adequacy of coronary revascularisation in intermediate LAD stenosis without functional evidence of ischaemia.

UK applicability

These findings are directly applicable to UK cardiac surgery practice, as coronary artery bypass grafting protocols and IMA graft techniques are standardised across the National Health Service. The data on graft failure predictors may inform pre-operative risk stratification and patient counselling in UK cardiac centres.

Key measures

IMA graft failure (≥75% stenosis) incidence and predictors; odds ratios for graft failure; incidence of subsequent acute clinical events; rates of repeat revascularisation

Outcomes reported

The study examined the frequency of internal mammary artery (IMA) graft failure (≥75% stenosis) and identified predictors of failure at 12–18 months post-operatively. It assessed the relationship between IMA failure and subsequent clinical outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularisation.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.115.015549
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gavc-evqs21

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.