Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Manesh R. Patel, John Calhoon, Gregory Dehmer, J. Aaron Grantham, Thomas M. Maddox, David J. Maron, Peter K. Smith

Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2016 guideline document from major US cardiology societies (ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS) establishes consensus-based appropriate use criteria to guide clinical decision-making regarding coronary revascularisation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The criteria classify clinical scenarios according to appropriateness of intervention, aiming to optimise resource allocation and patient outcomes. As a clinical guideline rather than an empirical research study, it reflects expert consensus informed by published evidence available at the time of publication.

UK applicability

The guideline reflects North American clinical practice patterns and healthcare systems. UK applicability is limited, as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the National Health Service typically develop and adopt their own evidence-based guidance for acute coronary syndrome management; however, the clinical principles and evidence base may inform comparative UK guideline development.

Key measures

Appropriateness ratings for coronary revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting) across clinical presentations and patient subgroups with acute coronary syndromes

Outcomes reported

The paper presents consensus-based appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularisation procedures in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. The criteria classify clinical scenarios and patient presentations as appropriate, may be appropriate, or rarely appropriate for intervention.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Guideline
Study design
Guideline
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.034
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gavc-r84r8h

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.