Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryGrey literature

Issues of cross-cultural variations in cyber bullying across Europe and beyond

Peter K. Smith, Anke Görzig, Susanne Robinson

UWL Repository (University of West London) · 2018

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper addresses the largely Western-dominated research landscape on cyberbullying by examining cross-cultural variations in the phenomenon across Europe and beyond. The authors discuss methodological challenges in comparing cyberbullying rates and characteristics internationally, drawing on research from Asian Pacific Rim countries, South-East Asia, and other regions. The work suggests that understanding how cyberbullying differs across societal contexts requires careful attention to both definitional consistency and cultural variation.

UK applicability

As a European study with focus on international comparisons, findings are directly relevant to UK policy and research contexts. The paper's examination of methodological challenges in cross-national comparison is particularly applicable to UK efforts to harmonise cyberbullying research and policy with European counterparts.

Key measures

Cyberbullying and victimisation rates by country; demographic characteristics (age, gender); methodological comparability across nations

Outcomes reported

The study examined societal and cross-national variations in cyberbullying and victimisation rates, characteristics (including age and gender differences), and methodological challenges in comparing cyberbullying phenomena across different countries.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Grey literature
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Other
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gavd-41uxn9

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.