Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Evidence and consequences of academic drift in the field of dental research: A bibliometric analysis 2000–2015

Puck van der Wouden, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden, Hagay Shemesh, Peter van den Besselaar

BDJ Open · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This bibliometric study examined evidence of 'academic drift'—the phenomenon whereby academic incentive structures favour high-impact basic science publications over application-oriented research—within the dental research field using Web of Science citation network analysis from 2000–2015 across seven countries. The analysis found that 85.5% of references in dental journals cite only other dental journals, indicating limited knowledge exchange with non-dental fields, whilst the research output of dental institutes in dental research declined even as their basic science activity increased. The findings suggest that institutional incentives for academic prestige have created an imbalance in the dental research portfolio that may undermine the translation of research into improvements in dental healthcare services.

UK applicability

The findings are relevant to UK research governance and funding bodies (UKRI, NIHR) insofar as they illustrate how research evaluation metrics and journal impact factors can unintentionally disincentivise clinically relevant research. UK dental research institutes and policy-makers may use these results to inform research strategy, funding priorities, and academic reward systems to better align research portfolios with healthcare needs.

Key measures

Percentage of references in dental journals citing other dental journals (85.5%); share of dental research institute output in dental research (declining); research activity distribution across dental research, clinical medicine, basic science, public health and other fields

Outcomes reported

The study analysed citation networks and research output patterns in dental research across seven countries from 2000–2015, measuring the proportion of dental research institute output directed towards dental versus basic science research and the degree of knowledge exchange between dental and non-dental research fields.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Bibliometric analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1038/s41405-022-00093-w
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gcn5-1o47rn

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.