Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Outcome measures for oral health based on clinical assessments and claims data: feasibility evaluation in practice

Riët Hummel, J.J.M. Bruers, Onno van der Galiën, Wil J. M. van der Sanden, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden

BMC Oral Health · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Dutch feasibility study, conducted in collaboration with the healthcare insurer Achmea and general dental practitioners, sought to develop and test outcome measures for oral health using both claims records and clinical data. Of eight candidate measures tested, four (retreatment and three caries measures) proved feasible to collect, valid, and discriminative, enabling demonstration of variation across dental practices. The feedback of performance data to practitioners stimulated discussion on best practices, though some measures (tooth wear, periodontal health indices) were deemed insufficiently responsive or controversial for routine deployment.

UK applicability

The methodology and findings may inform development of outcome measures for oral healthcare in UK dental practice and NHS performance monitoring, though implementation would require adaptation to UK health system structures, data infrastructure, and regulatory frameworks. The identified challenges with data completeness and measure responsiveness are likely relevant to UK dental settings.

Key measures

Outcome measures for dental caries, tooth wear, periodontal health, and retreatment; feasibility of data collection; face validity; discriminative validity; clinical practice variation

Outcomes reported

The study identified and tested eight outcome measures for oral health (four on dental caries, one on tooth wear, two on periodontal health, one on retreatment) using health insurance claims records and clinical data from general dental practices. Four measures (retreatment and three dental caries measures) demonstrated feasibility, face validity, and discriminative validity, whilst others showed limited responsiveness or insufficient data.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Proof-of-practice feasibility study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Netherlands
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1186/s12903-017-0410-5
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gcn5-ehwaxx

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.