Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Associations of pain intensity and pain‐related disability with psychological and socio‐demographic factors in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a cross‐sectional study at a specialised dental clinic

Naichuan Su, Frank Lobbezoo, Arjen J. van Wijk, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden, Corine M. Visscher

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This cross-sectional study of 320 temporomandibular disorder patients examined psychological and socio-demographic predictors of pain intensity and pain-related disability. Whilst multiple psychological factors showed univariate associations with both outcomes, multivariate regression identified somatisation as the strongest independent predictor of pain intensity and depression as the strongest independent predictor of pain-related disability. The findings suggest that psychological profiling may help identify TMD patients at highest risk of severe or disabling pain.

UK applicability

The study was conducted at a specialised dental clinic using internationally standardised assessment tools, making the findings broadly applicable to UK dental and orofacial pain services. However, the specific clinic setting and patient population may limit generalisation to primary care or community TMD populations in the UK.

Key measures

Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Epworth Sleeping Scale (ESS), stress questionnaire, Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), characteristic pain intensity (CPI), disability points scales; logistic regression analysis

Outcomes reported

The study measured associations between psychological factors (somatisation, depression, stress, anxiety, daytime sleepiness, optimism) and socio-demographic variables with pain intensity and pain-related disability in TMD patients, assessed via standardised questionnaires and pain scales.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Research
Study design
Cross-sectional observational study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1111/joor.12479
Catalogue ID
BFmor3gcn5-kg1ep9

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.